|
|
|
Some
thoughts on Enigma Enigma
- without questions, nothing new is to be expected Nowadays
a treasure of excellent and inspired recordings is available.
In many performances however one sees an a-synchronicity, for example
playing
Monteverdi on a typical late eighteenth century violin. Or playing
renaissance
harpsichord music on late seventeenth instruments with enlarged
compass, and an
altered disposition and pitch. How musically convincing these
recordings are
indeed, Enigma feels the urge to view matters in the actual sequence of
time in
which art works were conceived. Key is the choice of instruments. The
fact of the matter is that these went through many changes in the
course of time and the final state of the instruments is sometimes far
away
from what it originally was. Irrespective of the type of instrument, in
the
course of time one sees fundamental changes in for example compass,
stringing,
intonation, tuning and volume. But these instruments in their original
state
where just those instruments on which for example composers like
Frescobaldi or
Couperin developed their art. Enigma
is re-examining established conventions in performance practice
and choice of instrument. Musicians performing under the Enigma label
always
try to approach instruments in their original design, without later
adaptations, constantly asking questions. And these experiences show
that when
one looks at the combination of instrument and composition in the right
perspective in time, seemingly strange or difficult details suddenly
make
sense. And most interestingly it changes the musical end result. Not
because
the instruments in their original design are better or worse, but
because they
are different. Music
is like poetry. A composer’s mastery is in the syntax,
punctuation, connotations of his writing. Especially in the sixteenth
and
seventeenth century, a composition takes place within a tight
framework. Within
this framework however, composers tried to explore all possibilities.
The same
goes for the instruments used. Given
the tools of the time both instruments and compositions were used
and explored to (and over) the cutting edge. Always focussing on the
larger
scale of things, the architecture of a piece, but at the same time
indulging in
the elegance of details in music and instrument building. Enigma
advocates the
same approach in recording. It all starts with the combination of a
thorough
knowledge of the historically informed performance practice and
intuition. In
this way letting the instrument tell the performer how to convey his
message in
the most pure and convincing way. Foremost not for the sheer sake of
musicology,
but this approach is merely a means towards an end. And in the end
it’s all
about beauty. Bert Kiewiet & Johan
Hofmann |
|
|